Compliance AI
Three assistants reduce the compliance team's load: an explanation of why a match was scored as a hit, a summary of an open case, and an entity resolution suggestion that merges records belonging to the same person or organization.
These assistants are built for the analyst console, not as a standalone integration surface: their inputs depend on context created in the panel — match assist needs a hitId, case summary needs a caseId. Do not build your integration on top of them.
The AI does not decide
All three produce suggestions, not decisions. Block, review and clear come from the decision API; the AI output is an explanation an analyst reads.
What you defend in an audit is not the model's output but the analyst's decision and the evidence behind it. A process that records an AI suggestion as the reason for a decision leaves that decision unowned in front of a regulator.
Related
- Decision API — where the decision is made
- Case Management — where the suggestions are read